Skip to content
June 17, 2025
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • Whatsapp
Indian Law Watch

Indian Law Watch

Healthcare Laws & Compliance Focus

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • About us
  • ANALYSIS
    • PRACTICE AREAS
    • GUEST AUTHOR
  • Videos
  • STUDENTS CORNER
    • INTERSHIPS & OPPORTUNTIES
  • LAW LIBRARY
    • Acts of Parliament
    • RECENT AMENDMENTS
    • LAW COMMISSION
    • SUPREME COURT UPDATES
  • PRESS RELEASES
  • Citizen Connect
    • SHARE YOUR LEGAL QUERIES
  • Legal Events Corner
    • CALL FOR PAPERS
    • CONFERENCE AND OTHER EVENTS
    • Events
  • PHOTO GALLERY
Watch
  • LATEST UPDATES

Elon Musk’s X seeks to squash Indian court ruling on content blocking

X, formerly known as Twitter, in July 2022 sought to overturn government orders to remove some content from its platform
sameerlakra August 3, 2023 2 min read
X formerly twitter
FacebookXPinterestLinkedInWhatsApp

X, formerly known as Twitter, in July 2022 sought to overturn government orders to remove some content from its platform

Social media platform X is seeking to quash an Indian court ruling that it was not compliant with Indian government orders to remove content, arguing it could embolden New Delhi to block more content and broaden the scope for censorship.

X, formerly known as Twitter, in July 2022 sought to overturn government orders to remove some content from its platform. A court in June 2023 quashed that request and imposed a fine of Rs 50 lakh ($60,560).

X has now appealed against that decision at the Karnataka High Court, arguing in a 96-page filing that the government “will be emboldened to issue more blocking orders” that violate the law. A single-judge bench of the high court had given the initial verdict.

The filing, which was dated August 1 but has not been posted publicly, was submitted by local law firm Poovayya & Co at the Karnataka High Court.

The original lawsuit predates X’s ownership by billionaire Elon Musk, who is also pursuing several business enterprises in India.

The Tesla chief executive is discussing an investment proposal to set up a factory there making electric vehicles and is seeking market entry for his satellite broadband firm SpaceX.

X said in the filing there must be “discernible parameters” on what mandates the blocking of an entire account instead of a specific post. Otherwise, the government’s “power to censor future content is untrammelled”.

Court hearings are typically held within several days after a filing is submitted.

The company in previous years has been asked by Indian authorities to act on content including accounts deemed supportive of Khalistan, posts alleged to have spread misinformation about protests by farmers, and tweets critical of the government’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Key issue

X’s main contention was that the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeiTY) had issued blocking orders under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act without issuing notice to the account holders, adds PTI.

The single judge bench had framed eight questions and only the question of locus standi for filing the petition was answered in favour of Twitter.

X had claimed that the government had between February 2, 2021 and February 28, 2022, issued 10 Government orders directing it to block 1,474 accounts, 175 tweets, 256 URLs and one hashtag. Twitter challenged the orders related to 39 of these URLs.

Source: Telegraph India

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About The Author

sameerlakra

See author's posts

Tags: Elon Musk karnataka high court TWITTER X

Continue Reading

Previous: Status quo on mass burial site; 17 injured in violence
Next: Mining of lithium reserves: Govt passes law allowing auction and mining of lithium reserves

Related News

image
1 min read
  • LATEST UPDATES
  • VIDEOS

Legal Aspects of Healthcare in India

Indian Law Watch 3 months ago
media barred
2 min read
  • LATEST UPDATES

Varanasi court bans media from covering Gyanvapi survey

sameerlakra August 10, 2023
Manipur video
1 min read
  • LATEST UPDATES

Manipur video: SC asks CBI not to proceed with recording women’s statements

sameerlakra August 1, 2023
June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« May    

Pharmacy Council of India (Website) (2)
4 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Chandigarh University, UP, Earns Prestigious Approval from Pharmacy Council to Launch Trailblazing Pharmacy Curriculum

Indian Law Watch 2 days ago
SARAF & PARTNERS I (Website)
1 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Desai & Diwanji | Deal Release | Desai & Diwanji Advises on Largest Private Credit Deal Outside the US

Indian Law Watch 2 days ago
SARAF & PARTNERS (Website)
1 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Saraf and Partners Proclaims Promotion Cohort: Equity Circle Expands by Three, Two Elevated to Full Partnership, Three Tapped as Future Partners

Indian Law Watch 2 days ago
TLH (Website)
3 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Tatva Legal Hyderabad rebrands as TLH, Advocates & Solicitors

Indian Law Watch 2 days ago
1
3 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Economic Laws Practice Counselled the Book Running Lead Managers, Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Limited and Axis Capital Limited, in Relation to the Lodgement of the Draft Red Herring Prospectus of Ravi Infrabuild Projects Limited

Indian Law Watch 2 weeks ago
Soft Laws (Website)
3 min read
  • CITIZEN CONNECT
  • PUBLICATIONS OF ILW

Soft Law: Analyzing the Failure of Voluntary Compliance in Pharma Sponsorships

Indian Law Watch 3 weeks ago
  • CONTACT US
  • Event Post
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • Whatsapp
Copyright © All rights reserved. | MoreNews by AF themes.