Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

SUPREME COURT UPDATES

Aspects on Burden of Proof, ECIR in PMLA Judgment Require a Relook: SC

PMLA Judgment

The interim protection granted, which was set to expire soon, has also been extended by another four weeks.

A Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice of India NV Ramana on Thursday, 25 August, heard a petition against the apex court’s landmark judgment dated 27 July, which had upheld the constitutional validity of provisions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.

Stating that the objective of the judgment was noble, the bench said that there were two issues with the apex court’s PMLA judgment that prima facie required a relook:

  • Regarding the non-providing of ECIR

  • Reversal of burden of proof and presumption of innocence

The interim protection granted, which was set to expire soon, has also been extended by another four weeks.

“We are not opposing any of the actions of the government to stop money laundering…(and) control the circulation of black money. It is definitely a serious thing,” the Supreme Court said, while also pointing out that the two issues mentioned above required further consideration.

The matter is now to be listed before an appropriate bench, as per CJI Ramana’s directions.

On Wednesday, a bench led by CJI Ramana passed an order permitting open court hearing in the review petition filed regarding the judgment upholding the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.

 

The Plea

The plea had been filed on Monday by Congress lawmaker Karti Chidambaram.

The Bench

The case was heard by a bench comprising Chief Justice of India NV Ramana, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice CT Ravikumar.

The crucial plea was heard on the penultimate working day of CJI Ramana, whose tenure as chief justice is set to end.

Justice Khanwilkar’s PMLA Judgment

On 27 July, a bench headed by Justice AM Khanwilkar had upheld the constitutional validity of provisions of the PMLA, including strict bail conditions in money-laundering cases, in variance to previous Supreme Court judgments.

Other provisions related to arrests, search, seizure, attachment, and admitting statements made to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) as evidence and the non-requirement to supply an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) were also upheld.

The Union government has been insisting that money laundering is an offence that is committed not only by unscrupulous businesspersons but also terror organisations, posing a grave threat to national security.

After the contentious ruling, several Opposition parties, including Trinamool Congress (TMC), Congress, DMK, Aam Admi Party (AAP), Shiv Sena, and others had issued a joint statement noting that the amendments have made it more conducive for the government to engage in political vendetta.

“We place on record our deep apprehension on the long-term implications of the recent Supreme Court judgement upholding (PMLA),” the statement read.

Source : The Quint