Skip to content
May 15, 2025
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • Whatsapp
Indian Law Watch

Indian Law Watch

Healthcare Laws & Compliance Focus

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • About us
  • ANALYSIS
    • PRACTICE AREAS
    • GUEST AUTHOR
  • Videos
  • STUDENTS CORNER
    • INTERSHIPS & OPPORTUNTIES
  • LAW LIBRARY
    • Acts of Parliament
    • RECENT AMENDMENTS
    • LAW COMMISSION
    • SUPREME COURT UPDATES
  • PRESS RELEASES
  • Citizen Connect
    • SHARE YOUR LEGAL QUERIES
  • Legal Events Corner
    • CALL FOR PAPERS
    • CONFERENCE AND OTHER EVENTS
    • Events
  • PHOTO GALLERY
Watch
  • LATEST UPDATES

Elon Musk’s X seeks to squash Indian court ruling on content blocking

X, formerly known as Twitter, in July 2022 sought to overturn government orders to remove some content from its platform
sameerlakra August 3, 2023 2 min read
X formerly twitter
FacebookXPinterestLinkedInWhatsApp

X, formerly known as Twitter, in July 2022 sought to overturn government orders to remove some content from its platform

Social media platform X is seeking to quash an Indian court ruling that it was not compliant with Indian government orders to remove content, arguing it could embolden New Delhi to block more content and broaden the scope for censorship.

X, formerly known as Twitter, in July 2022 sought to overturn government orders to remove some content from its platform. A court in June 2023 quashed that request and imposed a fine of Rs 50 lakh ($60,560).

X has now appealed against that decision at the Karnataka High Court, arguing in a 96-page filing that the government “will be emboldened to issue more blocking orders” that violate the law. A single-judge bench of the high court had given the initial verdict.

The filing, which was dated August 1 but has not been posted publicly, was submitted by local law firm Poovayya & Co at the Karnataka High Court.

The original lawsuit predates X’s ownership by billionaire Elon Musk, who is also pursuing several business enterprises in India.

The Tesla chief executive is discussing an investment proposal to set up a factory there making electric vehicles and is seeking market entry for his satellite broadband firm SpaceX.

X said in the filing there must be “discernible parameters” on what mandates the blocking of an entire account instead of a specific post. Otherwise, the government’s “power to censor future content is untrammelled”.

Court hearings are typically held within several days after a filing is submitted.

The company in previous years has been asked by Indian authorities to act on content including accounts deemed supportive of Khalistan, posts alleged to have spread misinformation about protests by farmers, and tweets critical of the government’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Key issue

X’s main contention was that the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeiTY) had issued blocking orders under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act without issuing notice to the account holders, adds PTI.

The single judge bench had framed eight questions and only the question of locus standi for filing the petition was answered in favour of Twitter.

X had claimed that the government had between February 2, 2021 and February 28, 2022, issued 10 Government orders directing it to block 1,474 accounts, 175 tweets, 256 URLs and one hashtag. Twitter challenged the orders related to 39 of these URLs.

Source: Telegraph India

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Tags: Elon Musk karnataka high court TWITTER X

Continue Reading

Previous: Status quo on mass burial site; 17 injured in violence
Next: Mining of lithium reserves: Govt passes law allowing auction and mining of lithium reserves

Related News

image
  • LATEST UPDATES
  • VIDEOS

Legal Aspects of Healthcare in India

Indian Law Watch 2 months ago
media barred
2 min read
  • LATEST UPDATES

Varanasi court bans media from covering Gyanvapi survey

sameerlakra August 10, 2023
Manipur video
1 min read
  • LATEST UPDATES

Manipur video: SC asks CBI not to proceed with recording women’s statements

sameerlakra August 1, 2023
NEW ADDITION (Website)
2 min read
  • PRESS RELEASE

Raunaq Bahadur Mathur embarks on a New Chapter as Partner, amplifying Saraf & Partners’ Dispute Resolution Arsenal

Indian Law Watch 18 hours ago
ELP (Website)
2 min read
  • PRESS RELEASE

Economic Laws Practice (ELP) Uses Vecflow to Scale Legal Work, and Lead in Legal AI Innovation

Indian Law Watch 1 week ago
Cough SYRUP (Website)
2 min read
  • IN THE NEWS
  • UNCATEGORIZED

Child Safety First: Delhi High Court and Central Government Tighten Rules on Cough Syrup and Cold Medicines for Children Below 4 Years

Indian Law Watch 2 weeks ago
ELP
1 min read
  • PRESS RELEASE
  • UNCATEGORIZED

ELP advises Canpac on the acquisition of the packaging business from Saptagiri Packagings

Indian Law Watch 3 weeks ago
Tatva Legal
2 min read
  • PRESS RELEASE

Press Release | Tatva Legal, Hyderabad Announces Annual Promotions for 2024–25

Indian Law Watch 3 weeks ago
Saraf and Partners (Website)
1 min read
  • PRESS RELEASE
  • UNCATEGORIZED

Saraf and Partners acts for Paytm group in its strategic investment in Dinie and entry into Brazil

Indian Law Watch 3 weeks ago
  • CONTACT US
  • Event Post
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • Whatsapp
Copyright © All rights reserved. | MoreNews by AF themes.
Cleantalk Pixel