Observing that judges have no business granting interviews on pending matters, the Supreme Court on Monday sought a report within four days from the Registrar General of the Calcutta High Court on whether Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay gave an interview to a news channel about the case related to the school job-for-bribe case in West Bengal. The apex court’s order came when TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee complained against Justice Gangopadhyay’s interview in TV channel ABP Ananada, while handling the case.
“I just want to say it that judges have no business granting interviews on matters which are pending,” Chief Justice DY Chandachud, sharing a bench with Justice PS Narasimha, said while taking strong note of the purported interview given by Justice Gangopadhyay to a news channel about the case.
-
“The petitioner (TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee) has annexed a translated transcript of an interview of Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay on a TV Channel ABP Ananda. The Registrar General of Calcutta High Court is directed to clarify from the judge as to whether he had been interviewed by the news channel. The Registrar General is directed to file his affidavit before this court on or before Thursday. We will list it on Friday,” the bench said.
-
The top court said it’s order will not come in the way of the ongoing investigation by the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in the alleged scam.
-
On being told by Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, appearing for the central probe agencies, that this may lead to stalling of the ongoing probe, the bench said the judge should not be giving an interview about the pending case that is before the single judge bench.
-
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Banerjee, referred to the translated transcription of the interview given by Justice Gangopadhyay in which he allegedly spoke against the TMC MP and party general secretary.”With the greatest respect and humility, this just cannot be done,” the senior lawyer said.
-
“I just want to say that judges have no business granting interviews on matters which are pending. If he said that about the petitioner, he has no business participating in the proceedings. The question is whether a judge who has made statements like these about a political personality should he be allowed to participate in the hearings. There has to be some process,” the CJI observed. The CJI said the judge should have recused himself and paved way for setting up another bench by the chief justice of the High Court.
-
On April 17, Supreme Court had stayed the Calcutta High Court’s April 13 order directing the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate to interrogate Banerjee and Kuntal Ghosh, an accused in the case, and file a report in HC based on that.
Source: Daily Pioneer
