Lack of Specialization Not a Ground for Medical Negligence in Patient's Treatment-NCDRC

The patient (Respondent’s late wife) was provided medical care as per prescribed medical standards and protocols for her condition.
There was no breach of duty of care by the Appellant hospital or the attending doctors.
Appropriate diagnostic tests and interventions were carried out, including:
- Blood tests, X-rays, CT scan, ECG, and ECHO.
- Intubation, oxygen mask, dialysis, Lasix injections, and antibiotics.
The Respondent failed to present solid evidence of deficiency in service or improper treatment related to kidney and lung issues.
No evidence from the subsequent hospital indicated negligence or improper treatment by the Appellant hospital.
The Respondent voluntarily discharged the patient against medical advice.
The Respondent did not discharge the burden of proving medical negligence.
According to legal precedents, including the Bolam Test and the Jacob Mathew case, no medical negligence or deficiency in service is established.
The State Commission’s finding of medical negligence is flawed and not supported by a full appreciation of the facts.
The treatment provided by the Appellant hospital addressed the kidney and lung issues based on available medical records.
There is no documentation or diagnosis from the later hospital visits supporting claims of incorrect treatment.
The only claim made was the lack of specialized doctors, which is insufficient to establish negligence.