Skip to content
June 17, 2025
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • Whatsapp
Indian Law Watch

Indian Law Watch

Healthcare Laws & Compliance Focus

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • About us
  • ANALYSIS
    • PRACTICE AREAS
    • GUEST AUTHOR
  • Videos
  • STUDENTS CORNER
    • INTERSHIPS & OPPORTUNTIES
  • LAW LIBRARY
    • Acts of Parliament
    • RECENT AMENDMENTS
    • LAW COMMISSION
    • SUPREME COURT UPDATES
  • PRESS RELEASES
  • Citizen Connect
    • SHARE YOUR LEGAL QUERIES
  • Legal Events Corner
    • CALL FOR PAPERS
    • CONFERENCE AND OTHER EVENTS
    • Events
  • PHOTO GALLERY
Watch
  • IN THE NEWS

Private member’s bill on Uniform Civil Code introduced in Rajya Sabha

vacreva December 9, 2022 3 min read
Private Member Bill
FacebookXPinterestLinkedInWhatsApp

Amid protests by the Opposition, the private member’s bill on Uniform Civil Code (UCC) was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on Friday. The bill was introduced by BJP member Kirodi Lal Meena.

A controversial private member’s Bill that seeks to provide for a panel to prepare a Uniform Civil Code was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on Friday.

‘The Uniform Civil Code in India Bill, 2020’ was introduced in the Upper House amid protests from opposition parties.

  • BJP MP Kirodi Lal Meena moved for leave to introduce the Bill to provide for the constitution of the national inspection and investigation committee for preparation of a Uniform Civil Code and its implementation throughout India and for matters connected therewith during the private member’s business.
  • However, opposition members from Trinamool Congress (TMC), Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (MDMK), Rashtriya Janata Dadl (RJD), Samajwadi Party (SP), Communist Party of India (CPI), CPI (Marxist), Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), and Congress protested against the introduction of the Bill saying, if passed, it will “destroy” the social fabric and unity in diversity that is prevalent in the country.
  • With the Opposition members seeking withdrawal of the Bill, Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar called for division and the motion for introduction of the Bill was passed with 63 votes in favour and 23 against it.
  • In the past, although the Bill was listed for introduction, it was not moved in the Upper House.
  • The Bill envisages a collection of laws to protect the personal rights of all citizens without considering religion.
  • “We have a private members’ Bill that is totally unconstitutional, unethical, anti-secular. It is being introduced as a private member’s Bill by an indulgent government to test the waters in a very dangerous game. This is brinkmanship,” Jawhar Sircar of the Trinamool Congress said.
  • He further said, “There is still time to refrain from making demonstrations of a temporary majority and inflict one sided opinion on a very secular and plural India.”
  • MDMK MP Vaiko accused the ruling dispensation of “implementing one after another agenda of the RSS and BJP” and said, “They have finished Kashmir. Now they have come to common civil code.”
  • He said it is leading towards “disaster of the country and its disintegration and minority people are terribly hurt”.
  • Similarly, Abdul Wahab of Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) said the Bill has been attempted to be introduced many times in the past and “this is a sort of provocation deliberately the BJP” and asserted that the uniform civil code cannot be implemented in India.
  • Leader of the House, Piyush Goyal objected to the allegations of the Opposition members.
  • “It is a legitimate right of a member to raise an issue, which is a directive principle of the Constitution…Let this subject be debated in the House. At this stage to cast aspersion on the government, to use the names of the very members of the constituent assembly to try to criticise at the introduction stage is uncalled for,” he retorted.
  • Manoj Kumar Jha of the RJD said when the Bill came for introduction on many occasions earlier, the BJP requested Meena not to proceed further and good sense prevailed then.
  • “I am witness to six such occasions. What has changed I don’t know,” he said, adding at a time when cities, villages and families have been “divided”, if such Bill was brought it would further divide the country.
  • Ram Gopal Yadav of SP said the Bill was against provisions of the Constitution related to fundamental rights and it should not have been allowed it to be introduced in the Upper House at all, requesting the Chairman to ask Meena to withdraw the Bill.
  • Opposing the Bill, Fauzia Khan of NCP said, “The beauty of Indian democracy and the uniqueness of India in the whole world lies in its unity in diversity and our diversity is extremely important. It has to be retained and it cannot be ravaged like this.”
  • Calling for withdrawal of the Bill, she said, “It is not in consonance with the uniqueness of our country. It is just not a Muslim-Hindu issue. It is a question of diversity in every way.”

Congress members L Hanumanthaiah, Imran Pratapgarhi and Jebi Mather Hisham along with CPI(M) members Elamaram Kareem, Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, V Sivadasan, John Brittas and AA Rahim also opposed the Bill saying it would lead to further polarisation in the country.

Source: The Economic Times

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About The Author

vacreva

See author's posts

Tags: Private Member's Bill rajya sabha UCC Uniform Civil Code

Continue Reading

Previous: Supreme Court warns Centre of ‘breakdown’
Next: No plan as of now to bring All India Judicial Service: Govt

Related News

Pharma Oversight
2 min read
  • IN THE NEWS

₹1.19 Cr Pharma Sponsorship Audit — Irregularities Surface, Soft Law Limitations Noted

Indian Law Watch 4 weeks ago
Cough SYRUP (Website)
2 min read
  • IN THE NEWS
  • UNCATEGORIZED

Child Safety First: Delhi High Court and Central Government Tighten Rules on Cough Syrup and Cold Medicines for Children Below 4 Years

Indian Law Watch 2 months ago
Superspecialization (Website)
1 min read
  • IN THE NEWS
  • UNCATEGORIZED

Lack of Specialization Not a Ground for Medical Negligence in Patient’s Treatment-NCDRC

Indian Law Watch 2 months ago
June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« May    

Pharmacy Council of India (Website) (2)
4 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Chandigarh University, UP, Earns Prestigious Approval from Pharmacy Council to Launch Trailblazing Pharmacy Curriculum

Indian Law Watch 3 days ago
SARAF & PARTNERS I (Website)
1 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Desai & Diwanji | Deal Release | Desai & Diwanji Advises on Largest Private Credit Deal Outside the US

Indian Law Watch 3 days ago
SARAF & PARTNERS (Website)
1 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Saraf and Partners Proclaims Promotion Cohort: Equity Circle Expands by Three, Two Elevated to Full Partnership, Three Tapped as Future Partners

Indian Law Watch 3 days ago
TLH (Website)
3 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Tatva Legal Hyderabad rebrands as TLH, Advocates & Solicitors

Indian Law Watch 3 days ago
1
3 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Economic Laws Practice Counselled the Book Running Lead Managers, Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Limited and Axis Capital Limited, in Relation to the Lodgement of the Draft Red Herring Prospectus of Ravi Infrabuild Projects Limited

Indian Law Watch 3 weeks ago
Soft Laws (Website)
3 min read
  • CITIZEN CONNECT
  • PUBLICATIONS OF ILW

Soft Law: Analyzing the Failure of Voluntary Compliance in Pharma Sponsorships

Indian Law Watch 3 weeks ago
  • CONTACT US
  • Event Post
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • Whatsapp
Copyright © All rights reserved. | MoreNews by AF themes.