The Supreme Court on Monday rejected BJP leader Syed Shahnawaz Hussain’s petition against the Delhi High Court order for registering an FIR on the accusation of rape. The apex court, which observed it will not interfere with the High Court order, said all remedies available under the law are open for Hussain.
“Let there be a fair investigation and, if there is nothing, it will exonerate you (Hussain),” a bench of Justices S Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta told the counsel appearing for Hussain.
-
Senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Siddharth Luthra, representing Hussain, told the bench that complaint after complaint was filed by a woman against the politician.
-
“There are complaints after complaints which were investigated by the police and nothing was found. It cannot go on and on,” Rohatgi argued, adding there was a “series of consistent attacks” against Hussain.
-
However, the bench observed, “We find no reason to interfere.”
-
During the hearing, the top court observed that till date the statement of the complainant under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), which deals with recording of confessions and statements before a magistrate, has not been recorded.
-
Luthra argued the complainant had alleged that she was in a relationship with Hussain’s brother.
-
“She may have all the grievances against my brother…. But I (Hussain) cannot be put to such trauma,” he said. “Let it be investigated,” the bench observed, adding the orders of the trial court as well as the High Court in the matter were against Hussain.
-
When Luthra said once an FIR is lodged, there may be consequences, the bench observed, “What consequences? You are not being held guilty. We are applying the law as we see. In a simple case, the victim has to run through all these loops.”
-
When reference was made to the trial court record, the apex court said, “We have come to the stage of trial court record even before an FIR is registered. This speaks volume about this case.”
-
Hussain’s counsel said the complainant had approached the court on every occasion with multiple complaints. The bench asked whether the police had informed the complainant that there was no sufficient ground to proceed and lodge an FIR in the matter. “You may be a victim, she may not be a victim but there is a possibility of reverse also,” the bench observed.
-
The High Court had on August 17 last year dismissed Hussain’s plea challenging a trial court order directing the Delhi Police to register an FIR against him, saying there was no perversity in the 2018 order. The top court had on August 22, 2022 stayed the operation of the high court order.
-
In 2018, a Delhi-based woman had approached a lower court seeking registration of an FIR against Hussain for alleged rape, which the BJP leader has denied. A magisterial court had on July 7, 2018 ordered registration of an FIR against Hussain, saying a cognisable offence was made out in the complaint. This was challenged by the BJP leader before a sessions court which had dismissed his plea.
Source: Daily Pioneer
