Skip to content
June 17, 2025
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • Whatsapp
Indian Law Watch

Indian Law Watch

Healthcare Laws & Compliance Focus

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • About us
  • ANALYSIS
    • PRACTICE AREAS
    • GUEST AUTHOR
  • Videos
  • STUDENTS CORNER
    • INTERSHIPS & OPPORTUNTIES
  • LAW LIBRARY
    • Acts of Parliament
    • RECENT AMENDMENTS
    • LAW COMMISSION
    • SUPREME COURT UPDATES
  • PRESS RELEASES
  • Citizen Connect
    • SHARE YOUR LEGAL QUERIES
  • Legal Events Corner
    • CALL FOR PAPERS
    • CONFERENCE AND OTHER EVENTS
    • Events
  • PHOTO GALLERY
Watch
  • SUPREME COURT UPDATES

SC says it will decide legal issues related to appointment of police chiefs of Delhi, other cities ‘once and for all’

vacreva February 28, 2023 4 min read
appointment
FacebookXPinterestLinkedInWhatsApp

Earlier on January 16, the apex court had disposed of the petition of the NGO ‘CPIL’ challenging the appointment of now-retired IPS officer Rakesh Asthana as the Delhi Police Commissioner.

The Supreme Court on Monday said it will deal decide “once and for all” the legal issue of whether the earlier apex court judgement laying down procedures for the appointment of the Director General of Police (DGP) in states will also be applicable to Delhi and other cities.

The top court, hearing petitions challenging the appointment of senior IPS officer Rakesh Asthana as the Delhi Police Commissioner, said the pleas, so far as they relate to the appointment of Asthana, have become infructuous as the officer has superannuated.

  • However, the part Delhi High Court verdict, which had held that the apex court judgement in the Prakash Singh case applies to state DGPs only and not to cities like Delhi and the selection of Commissioner of Police, needs to be dealt with as it has a recurring effect, a bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud said and added the matter will be listed in April.
  • “While dismissing the plea of NGO ‘Centre for Public Interest Litigation’ (CPIL), the high court had said the apex court decision in the Prakash Singh case, which mandated a minimum tenure for certain police officials and the constitution of a UPSC panel before selection, was not applicable to the appointment of the Police Commissioner for Delhi.
  • “This observation (of Delhi High Court) is required to be dealt with because this issue has a recurring effect… We will accordingly list this SLP (special leave petition) in April so that the issue is resolved,” said the bench which also comprised Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala.
  • Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, appearing for NGO CPIL, said unless the issue, arising out of the Delhi High Court verdict, is dealt with “it will keep coming up again and again”.
  • “We will decide this once and for all,” the CJI said.
  • The bench, meanwhile, disposed of another petition seeking the appointment of a new DGP in Sikkim after it was apprised that the exercise has been completed as per the procedures prescribed by the apex court.
  • Amarendra Kumar Singh, a 1990 batch IPS officer, has been appointed as the new DGP of Sikkim and he took charge on January 4, 2023. He will continue as the DGP till January 4, 2025.
  • Earlier on January 16, the apex court had disposed of the petition of the NGO ‘CPIL’ challenging the appointment of now-retired IPS officer Rakesh Asthana as the Delhi Police Commissioner.
  • The top court, while closing the pleas, had then said that the legal issues involved would remain open for adjudication.
  • Asthana, a 1984-batch Gujarat cadre IPS officer, who was serving as the Director General of the Border Security Force, was appointed the Delhi Police Commissioner on July 27, 2021 just four days before he was scheduled to retire. He was shifted to the Union Territory cadre from the Gujarat cadre for one year.
  • Asthana retired on July 31, last year.
  • The high court had dismissed the pleas challenging Asthana’s appointment as the Delhi police chief. In its affidavit, the Centre had said the NGO’s petition is an abuse of the process of law and, manifestly, an outcome of some personal vendetta against the then police commissioner.
  • The high court, in its verdict, had upheld the Centre’s decision to appoint Asthana as the Delhi Police Commissioner, saying there was “no irregularity, illegality or infirmity” in his selection.
  • Dismissing the PIL challenging his selection, it had said the justification and reasons given by the Centre for appointing Asthana are “plausible, calling for no interference in judicial review”.
  • The 2006 apex court verdict in the Prakash Singh case said the DGP of a state shall be “selected by the state government from amongst the three senior-most officers of the department who have been empanelled for promotion to that rank by the UPSC on the basis of their length of service, very good record and range of experience for heading the police force”.
  • And, once a person has been selected for the job, they should have a minimum tenure of at least two years irrespective of the date of superannuation, it had said.
  • The DGP may, however, be relieved of his responsibilities by the state government acting in consultation with the State Security Commission, consequent upon any action taken against him under the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules or following his conviction in a court of law in a criminal offence or a case of corruption, or if he is otherwise incapacitated from discharging his duties, the court had said.

Source: Money Control

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About The Author

vacreva

See author's posts

Tags: appointment Delhi Police chief Rakesh Asthana

Continue Reading

Previous: History can’t haunt present; Supreme Court
Next: How to write a research paper?

Related News

Senior Citizen
1 min read
  • SUPREME COURT UPDATES

Rights of a senior citizen to claim back their transferred property under Maintenance and Welfare of the Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007

Indian Law Watch 2 months ago
Freedom of Speech (Website)
2 min read
  • SUPREME COURT UPDATES

Police Have Duty To Protect Freedom Of Speech: Supreme Court

Indian Law Watch 2 months ago
Railway Catering
2 min read
  • SUPREME COURT UPDATES

Supreme Court Directs Indian Railways to Implement CVC Report on Catering Fraud

Indian Law Watch 4 months ago
June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« May    

Pharmacy Council of India (Website) (2)
4 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Chandigarh University, UP, Earns Prestigious Approval from Pharmacy Council to Launch Trailblazing Pharmacy Curriculum

Indian Law Watch 3 days ago
SARAF & PARTNERS I (Website)
1 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Desai & Diwanji | Deal Release | Desai & Diwanji Advises on Largest Private Credit Deal Outside the US

Indian Law Watch 3 days ago
SARAF & PARTNERS (Website)
1 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Saraf and Partners Proclaims Promotion Cohort: Equity Circle Expands by Three, Two Elevated to Full Partnership, Three Tapped as Future Partners

Indian Law Watch 3 days ago
TLH (Website)
3 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Tatva Legal Hyderabad rebrands as TLH, Advocates & Solicitors

Indian Law Watch 3 days ago
1
3 min read
  • PRESS RELEASES

Economic Laws Practice Counselled the Book Running Lead Managers, Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Limited and Axis Capital Limited, in Relation to the Lodgement of the Draft Red Herring Prospectus of Ravi Infrabuild Projects Limited

Indian Law Watch 3 weeks ago
Soft Laws (Website)
3 min read
  • CITIZEN CONNECT
  • PUBLICATIONS OF ILW

Soft Law: Analyzing the Failure of Voluntary Compliance in Pharma Sponsorships

Indian Law Watch 3 weeks ago
  • CONTACT US
  • Event Post
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • Whatsapp
Copyright © All rights reserved. | MoreNews by AF themes.